sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4538
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC lis
--- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-05-23
05:23 ---
and your reason for this is statement is because...?
The C++ spec is pretty clear. binutils is not handling linking of C++ code
properly when it's in an archive.
I get the idea of the archive is to
--- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-05-23
08:19 ---
Ah, but unfortunately Mr. Earnshaw was arguing up the wrong tree there. Just
because we understand
why the current implementation is producing the results we see, doesn't mean
the current
implement
--- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-05-23
16:25 ---
> You are incorrect. The standard does not cover archive libraries, and
> so the definition of "container" you're assuming has no basis in the
> standard.
It doesn't need to c
--- Additional Comments From ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu 2007-08-07
03:37 ---
Such a good, persuasive argument! You've raised many good points that I hadn't
considered...
OK then, lets call it an "enhancement", and I'll reword the summary for you.
The f
