: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: dougkwan at google dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2007-07-16 23:38
---
Created an attachment (id=1918)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1918&action=view)
Proposed fix for SEGV problem in dwarf2.c
Tested this patch in i686-linux-gnu. Looked okay.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Doug Kwan 20
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
--- Comment #5 from Doug Kwan 2011-11-01 21:24:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I am looking at it.
This is a different problem than bug 12771, which happened in the ARM backend.
The problem here is that relocate_for_relocatable does d
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
--- Comment #9 from Doug Kwan 2011-11-10 05:26:10
UTC ---
I think there are still problems. I had problem reproducing this on a
Pandaboard but I will try adding an assert in rel to see if I can
catch all problems.
-Doug
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13320
--- Comment #3 from Doug Kwan 2011-12-02 19:23:56
UTC ---
Thanks for working on this. You can run the test suite using QEMU, it
is slow but it does the job. You do need to treat one of test case
because it has too many sections that gold run
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13320
--- Comment #5 from Doug Kwan 2011-12-02 20:42:21
UTC ---
ubuntu karmic. I wish I could use QEMU linux-user but I right now I
had to use the system emulator.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, froydnj at gmail dot com
wrote:
> http://sourcewa
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #4 from Doug Kwan 2013-03-07 04:04:35
UTC ---
The symbols __exidx_end & __exidx_start were exported incorrectly in
the past. This is fixed in both ld & gold in the sense that these
symbols are defined by not exported. I think def
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #6 from Doug Kwan 2013-03-07 05:42:20
UTC ---
The symbols do not have same visibility. gold in general is
compatible with GNU ld. If you look at src/ld/emulparams/, you will
set that the __bss symbols are exported but the __exidx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #8 from Doug Kwan 2013-03-07 08:10:16
UTC ---
Hi Pete,
1. My concern of your patch is that it affects all targets, not just
ARM. While it may fix the problem on ARM, I cannot speak for authors
of other backends.
2. I am don't hav
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #10 from Doug Kwan 2013-03-13 03:57:35
UTC ---
I have no object to what is proposed but the decision is Ian's.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:03 PM, petechou at gmail dot com
wrote:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #14 from Doug Kwan 2013-03-20 04:41:03
UTC ---
The special symbols in question __exidx_{start,end} were exported from
DSO's by mistake in both ld & gold and the mistake has been fixed in
both linkers. We really don't want referenc
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dougkwan at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 8556
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8556&action=edit
test case for bug
I have found
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-02-04 19:47
---
Can you try this patch and send me back the error message?
Index: arm.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gold/arm.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-02-04 22:09
---
Patch for build breakage submitted in
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-02/msg00070.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11247
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-02-05 00:34
---
The build breakage has been fixed but we still need to fix the assertion. I
built Qt-4.6.1 for arm-unknown-linux-gnu using gold as the linker but did not
see the assertion. I am trying again using the "-
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-02-05 17:56
---
Subject: Re: Assert failure in arm.cc
2010/2/5 ahartmetz at gmail dot com :
> I've updated bintuils to the latest CVS version and applied the patch (I
> removed
> the assert before the debug
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-02-06 04:31
---
I added code to avoid stub scanning for merged sections. This should fix your
problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dougkwan at google dot com 2010-08-03 20:11
---
Your testcase needs other libraries. Can you attached two copies of
eina_chained_mempool.so, one linked with gold and the ld?
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm try build modules for eina:
>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12826
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> CC| |dougkwan at google dot com,
> | |ian at airs dot com
> Resolution|WORKSFORME |
>
> --- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-06-30
> 06:00:32 UTC ---
> OK, I looked at this a b
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565
--- Comment #11 from Doug Kwan 2011-06-30 18:24:45
UTC ---
The ARM linux kernel also uses NOLOAD. I added support for that in
gold to link the kernel.
-Doug
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Nick Clifton writes:
>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
--- Comment #13 from Doug Kwan 2011-07-06 07:00:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> There is no doubt that the patch is incomplete. That just fixed a single
> instance of code that must be fixed in a number of different places.
I have a p
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
--- Comment #14 from Doug Kwan 2011-07-06 07:48:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > There is no doubt that the patch is incomplete. That just fixed a single
> > instance of code that must be fixed in a number
||dougkwan at google dot com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Doug Kwan 2011-07-06 18:25:39
UTC ---
This should be fixed in trunk by this patch in April.
2011-04-22 Doug Kwan
* arm.cc (Arm_output_section::Arm_output_section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12771
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
28 matches
Mail list logo