[Bug ld/12578] New: Alignment of a common symbol overridden by a definition

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12578 Summary: Alignment of a common symbol overridden by a definition Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Bug ld/12578] Alignment of a common symbol overridden by a definition

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12578 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-13 17:38:56 UTC --- Created attachment 5303 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5303 Testcase Compile it with GCC 4.5 or later and `-O3 -march=pentium3' options. -- Configure b

[Bug ld/12277] Linker error: "final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output"

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-13 17:43:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Recent ld.dk seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug binutils/12558] AR "move in an archive" operation fails

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- Configu

[Bug gold/12559] GOLD cannot find entry symbol in a static library

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12559 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12370] Symbols present in LTO symbol table resolved as PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY and optimized out appears in final symbol table.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12370 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-07-14 19:11:47 UTC --- Created attachment 5850 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5850 List of symbols > Can you identify exactly which symbols are appearing > in the final output,

[Bug gold/12431] `gold -r' strips LTO sections

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12431 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFO

[Bug gold/12370] Symbols present in LTO symbol table resolved as PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY and optimized out appears in final symbol table.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12370 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-07-14 23:07:37 UTC --- > Are you using gold from binutils-2.21 or top of trunk? Recent trunk; i686-pc-linux-gnu. > Gold does still leave two of those symbols in the a.out: When linking with libstdc+

[Bug gold/12431] `gold -r' strips LTO sections

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12431 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-07-15 12:34:43 UTC --- Created attachment 5851 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5851 Object file with .gnu.lto_.* sections -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/u

[Bug ld/13059] New: MinGW linker can't send output to /dev/null

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13059 Summary: MinGW linker can't send output to /dev/null Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: una

[Bug ld/13183] New: BFD linker does not work correctly with thin archives and LTO

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13183 Bug #: 13183 Summary: BFD linker does not work correctly with thin archives and LTO Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/13183] BFD linker does not work correctly with thin archives and LTO

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13183 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-13 07:28:57 UTC --- Created attachment 5931 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5931 Proposed patch -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug ld/13183] BFD linker does not work correctly with thin archives and LTO

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13183 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-14 20:35:59 UTC --- Patch: . -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this ma

[Bug ld/12975] --gc-sections doesn't remove symbols hidden with version scripts

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12975 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-14 22:22:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) It would be even better if BFD LD could remove `bar' without --gc-sections but with lto. GOLD does it. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bug

[Bug ld/13183] BFD linker does not work correctly with thin archives and LTO

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13183 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12975] --gc-sections doesn't remove symbols hidden with version scripts

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12975 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug ld/12975] --gc-sections doesn't remove symbols hidden with version scripts

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12975 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-16 02:33:10 UTC --- I can't reproduce the original issue with recent GOLD (ver. 1.11/2.21.53.20110913) on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It still fails with BFD LD on i686-pc-mingw32 (with --gc-sections, but n

[Bug binutils/12337] Demangle modified function names

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12337 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-09-24 10:36:33 UTC --- Cary Coutant fixed it in GCC. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the C

[Bug binutils/12337] Demangle modified function names

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12337 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/13256] New: AR + plugin fails with "no operation specified" error

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13256 Bug #: 13256 Summary: AR + plugin fails with "no operation specified" error Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 C

[Bug binutils/13257] New: NM + plugin does not list correctly symbols in thin archives

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13257 Bug #: 13257 Summary: NM + plugin does not list correctly symbols in thin archives Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

<    1   2