[Bug ld/14426] New: add --ignore-unresolved-symbol from NetBSD

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14426 Bug #: 14426 Summary: add --ignore-unresolved-symbol from NetBSD Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) URL: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2008/04/03

[Bug gprofng/30779] gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779 John Doe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmenot at mailinator dot com

[Bug gprofng/30889] New: can't compile without large file support

onent: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15128 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15128&action=edit only use O_LARGEFILE if defined here'

[Bug gprofng/30893] New: gprofng uses syscall + perf_event (hwcdrv) and ptrace (gpcollect) without any check and doc

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- gprofng should either have an option to build without syscall + perf_event or an

[Bug gprofng/30894] New: bison should be no hard dependency

: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15132 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15132&action=edit ditribute bison generated files When running from a distr

[Bug gprofng/30895] New: gprofng is not relocatable

Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- To reproduce on a clean system: ./configure make make install DESTDIR=/tmp cd /tmp/usr/local/bin ./gprofng collect app ls Creating experiment directory test.1.er (Process ID

[Bug gprofng/30896] New: gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions

Version: 2.41 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- "gprofng display text -metrics n

[Bug gprofng/30897] New: Support source view for "referenced" source (e.g. bison)

nhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- There is an example within gprofng for that. When looking at QLParser we only can show the source file QLPar

[Bug gprofng/30898] New: consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- recording a sample program that uses lots of shared object files (most loaded with dlopen) using "gprofng collect app" is quite fast;

[Bug gprofng/30897] Support source view for "referenced" source (e.g. bison)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30897 --- Comment #2 from John Doe --- Please also consider that (depending on the generator) some functions don't "start" in their "real sources". Actually this is also the case for QLParser.yy, where yylex is declared at line 42 but actually defin

[Bug gprofng/30896] gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30896 --- Comment #2 from John Doe --- Thank you, I've misread the docs, works as expected. You may consider to add this example to the docs as this would make it totally clear. Feel free to either mark this issue as RESOLVED(INVALID) or change it

[Bug gprofng/30897] Support source view for "referenced" source (e.g. bison)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30897 --- Comment #3 from John Doe --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #1) > It is a bug. > A workaround could be to look at the functions from QLParser.yy. > For example: > > gprofng display text -dis QL::yylex > gprofng display text

[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 --- Comment #2 from John Doe --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #1) > Did you try > gprofng display text -func /tmp/binutils-2.41/build/test.2.er > > Is this also slow? Sorry I didn't include that information - yes, I've tried

[Bug binutils/23235] New: make check uses system installed ld, not the one build

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- There are nor issues during configure or make but make check has unexpected fails. One of the reasons (found in binutils/binutils.log): The ld

[Bug ld/23237] New: make check for ld fails

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bugmenot at mailinator dot com Target Milestone: --- # of expected passes1566 # of unexpected failures2 # of expected failures 4 # of unresolved testcases 1 # of untested testcases 1 # of

[Bug ld/23237] make check for ld fails

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23237 --- Comment #2 from John Doe --- Created attachment 11072 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11072&action=edit ld.log internal test results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/10125] New: Fail to link "chained" shared objects

s Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: bugmenot at mailinator dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourcew

[Bug gold/10125] Fail to link "chained" shared objects

--- Additional Comments From bugmenot at mailinator dot com 2009-05-04 00:12 --- Never mind, this was a stripped down testcase from a bigger problem which was wrong. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gold/10126] New: internal error in relocate_sections, at ../../gold/reloc.cc:737

AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: bugmenot at mailinator dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10126 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is

[Bug gold/10126] internal error in relocate_sections, at ../../gold/reloc.cc:737

--- Additional Comments From bugmenot at mailinator dot com 2009-05-10 04:24 --- Created an attachment (id=3929) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3929&action=view) Object file example Here is an example object. I'm pretty sure the compiler generate