[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-07-22 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at linux dot ibm.com -- You

[Bug gas/29466] APP/NO_APP with linefile

2022-08-29 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29466 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at linux dot ibm.com

[Bug gas/24349] New: [powerpc] gas rejects valid branch instruction and doesn't set "at" branch hints correctly

2019-03-15 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bergner at linux dot ibm.com Target Milestone: --- bergner@pike:~/binutils/BCTAR$ cat -n bug1.s 1 .text 2

[Bug gas/24349] [powerpc] gas rejects valid branch instruction and doesn't set "at" branch hints correctly

2019-03-15 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |bergner at linux dot ibm.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/24349] [powerpc] gas rejects valid branch instruction and doesn't set "at" branch hints correctly

2019-04-03 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24349 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug gas/24349] [powerpc] gas rejects valid branch instruction and doesn't set "at" branch hints correctly

2019-04-04 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24349 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/27647] [PowerPC] Extended conditional branch mnemonics should accept an optional branch hint operand

2021-03-24 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27647 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at linux dot ibm.com -- You

[Bug ld/28824] relro security issues

2022-01-26 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at linux dot ibm.com -- You

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-24 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Björn 'besser82' Esser from comment #3) > tls_model("global-dynamic") is affected in the same way by this bug. This is due to it being optimized to a module id == 0 case, so the same issue as

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-25 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Created attachment 15806 [details] > proposed fix I can confirm that fixes the bug for me and the ld testsuite results look good too. It's also a much simpler pa

[Bug ld/32387] New: ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-23 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bergner at linux dot ibm.com Target Milestone: --- We SEGV on the following simple test case when our library function is compiled with -fno-plt. bergner@c643n10lp1:bug$ cat

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-23 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/32387] ppc64 TLS local-dynamic optimization bug when built with -fno-plt

2024-11-23 Thread bergner at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- Alan, you designed our TLS support and the TLS optmizations. Do you have a preference on how this should be fixed from the options I mentioned or is there a better option I didn't think of? -- You are r