[Bug ld/32991] New: "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled

2025-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 Bug ID: 32991 Summary: "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug gprofng/32892] source line level information not available with "-g -O2"

2025-05-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892 --- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=52d8d0c4fff5c48145a4156338c1f5c19b3c commit 52d8d0c4fff5c48145a4156338c1

[Bug gprofng/32943] libgprofng.so: undefined reference to `std::ios_base_library_init()'

2025-05-21 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence

2025-05-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32017 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3e4052fb33871987a087fb6025c8e7ab27f01d01 commit 3e4052fb33871987a087fb6025c8e

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|"pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is |"pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is

[Bug gprofng/32892] source line level information not available with "-g -O2"

2025-05-21 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- gprofng cannot read split-dwarf. But gprofng should support other Dwarf-5 extensions. New version of gprofng looks good on attached gpref and test.1.er Let me know if you see problems. -- You are

[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

2025-05-21 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_