[Bug ld/32968] [avr] Assert that .progmem is located in the lower 64 KiB of program memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32968 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug ld/32968] New: [avr] Assert that .progmem is located in the lower 64 KiB of program memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32968 Bug ID: 32968 Summary: [avr] Assert that .progmem is located in the lower 64 KiB of program memory Product: binutils Version: 2.44 Status: NEW Severity: enha

Issue 417866079: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/417866079 Reference Info: 417866079 binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz status: New reporter: 87...@d

[Bug ld/32961] ".pushsection" may introduce unnecessary section dependency which impacts "--gc-sections"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961 --- Comment #20 from Zhiyuan Lv --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #19) > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #18) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16) > > > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15) > > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from

[Bug ld/32961] ".pushsection" may introduce unnecessary section dependency which impacts "--gc-sections"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961 --- Comment #21 from Zhiyuan Lv --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #12) > > Hi H.J., > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://sourceware.o

[Bug ld/32969] New: Build of BCC fails with relocation of misaligned symbol during link on s390x

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32969 Bug ID: 32969 Summary: Build of BCC fails with relocation of misaligned symbol during link on s390x Product: binutils Version: 2.44 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug ld/32969] Build of BCC fails with relocation of misaligned symbol during link on s390x

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32969 Jens Remus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com Tar

[Bug gas/23570] AVR .noinit section defaults to PROGBITS used to be NOBITS

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23570 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr CC|

Re: Issue 417866079: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/417866079 Changed Disclosure: → Aug 13, 2025 ___ Reference Info: 417866079 binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc component

[Bug ld/32961] ".pushsection" may introduce unnecessary section dependency which impacts "--gc-sections"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16087|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/32961] ".pushsection" may introduce unnecessary section dependency which impacts "--gc-sections"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #21) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #12) > > > Hi H.J., > > > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools a

Re: Issue 417866079: binutils:fuzz_as: Direct-leak in xmalloc

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/417866079 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gs

[Bug gold/25754] [gold] x86: don't relax GOTPCRELX for SHN_ABS

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25754 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/25749] Non-const relocation against SHN_ABS symbol in PIE or shared library should be disallowed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25749 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/28743] -z relro creates holes in the process image on GNU/Linux

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28743 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-z relro creats holes in|-z relro creates holes in

[Bug ld/28743] -z relro creats holes in the process image on GNU/Linux

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28743 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|2.38|2.45 --- Comment #25 from Sam James ---

[Bug ld/28743] -z relro creates holes in the process image on GNU/Linux

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28743 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||28824 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug ld/28824] relro security issues

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||28743 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug ld/32546] ld tests failing with -std=gnu23 default

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4058d5a38a1dc97ac7d7fd4a9cac154b6217fcfa commit 4058d5a38a1dc97ac7d7fd4a9ca

[Bug ld/12982] BFD linker LTO plugin makes stack executable by default

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12982 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/23929] Missing .note.gnu.property with -flto

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23929 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32961] ".pushsection" may introduce unnecessary section dependency which impacts "--gc-sections"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961 --- Comment #24 from Zhiyuan Lv --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23) > Created attachment 16095 [details] > The final patch > > This is the final patch I am submitting. Please test. Tested with both my small test case here and kernel