https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Created attachment 15975 [details]
> A patch
Hi H.J.
Well this is a nice idea, but it also raises the issue I pointed out in
comment #1. Code like this makes th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32741
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|objdump -R: dump SHT_RELR |libbfd doesn't report RELR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> The BFD library provides:
>
> 1. bfd_get_dynamic_reloc_upper_bound to count dynamic relocations.
> 2. bfd_canonicalize_dynamic_reloc to retrieve dynamic reloctions.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #5 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15981
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15981&action=edit
Archive containing build of libadwaita with binutils 2.43.1
This archive contains a release and a debug build with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #7 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Which binaries in the libadwaita package differ? Could you upload a bad and
> good tarball, where one is built w/ binutils-2.43.1, and one is built w/
> binutils-2.44?
I u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #8 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Also, does libadwaita's testsuite pass?
Yes, the testsuite passes successfully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Toolybird changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolybird at tuta dot io
--- Comment #4 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Also, does libadwaita's testsuite pass?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
> they are not functional when executed.
Do they crash on startup? Look wrong? Otherwise malfunction (how)? Can you give
a backtrace if they crash?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32746
Bug ID: 32746
Summary: ctf_member_info() cannot handle anonymous structs with
cvr-quals
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32746
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nick.alcock at oracle
dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #1 from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Bug ID: 32745
Summary: The ld in binutils 2.44 produces a malfunctioning
libadwaita library
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
17 matches
Mail list logo
