[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol

2024-10-25 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #13 from Nelson Chu --- There are at least two reviewed patches should resolve this, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-May/127413.html https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-May/134442.html Looks no one really

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

2024-10-25 Thread marc.chevrier at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 --- Comment #1 from Marc CHEVRIER --- This regression seems related to commit 057a2b4c4b5, 2024-06-26, binutils-2_43~266. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

2024-10-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Bug 31904 depends on bug 32300, which changed state. Bug 32300 Summary: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol

2024-10-25 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #14 from Nelson Chu --- > Yes. the relaxation like “.set ARCHOR0, . + 4598” being relaxed at 2nd pass > or 3rd pass would be fine I don't understand why the 2nd pass or 3rd pass should be fine? Even 2nd or 3rd passes still have

[Bug ld/32300] New: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

2024-10-25 Thread marc.chevrier at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Bug ID: 32300 Summary: --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected Product: binutils Version: 2.43 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol

2024-10-25 Thread lifang_xia at linux dot alibaba.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 --- Comment #12 from lifang_xia at linux dot alibaba.com --- > 2024年10月25日 14:43,i at maskray dot me 写道: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 > > Fangrui Song changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

2024-10-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 commit 6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

2024-10-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 --- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c544 commit 6ecc44f6980c0f8c0f0934bc10412c1d7fa3c54

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

2024-10-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||31904 CC|

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

2024-10-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32300 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcew

[Bug ld/32300] --dependency-file: link dependencies are not all collected

2024-10-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/31904] libdep.so plugin registers search path after default paths in bfd linker

2024-10-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904 --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra --- I'm guessing the proposed patch was committed accidentally. Please see pr32300. Reverting the accidental patch also ficed x86_64-w64-mingw32 FAIL: libdep test: did not get expected output from the linker -