Re: Issue 373568787: binutils:fuzz_nm: Invalid-bool-value in coff_find_nearest_line_with_names

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/373568787 Changed Disclosure: → Jan 13, 2025 ___ Reference Info: 373568787 binutils:fuzz_nm: Invalid-bool-value in coff_find_

Re: Issue 372093895: binutils:fuzz_dlltool: Null-dereference READ in _bfd_mips_elf_symbol_processing

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/372093895 Changed access level: Limited visibility → Default access ___ Reference Info: 372093895 binutils:fuzz_dlltool: Null-

Re: Issue 371546806: binutils:fuzz_nm: Null-dereference READ in bfd_hash_lookup

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/371546806 Changed pe...@google.com added comment #3: This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. ___ Reference

Re: Issue 371546806: binutils:fuzz_nm: Null-dereference READ in bfd_hash_lookup

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/371546806 Changed access level: Limited visibility → Default access ___ Reference Info: 371546806 binutils:fuzz_nm: Null-deref

Re: Issue 372093895: binutils:fuzz_dlltool: Null-dereference READ in _bfd_mips_elf_symbol_processing

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/372093895 Changed pe...@google.com added comment #3: This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. ___ Reference

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #8 from Michael Matz --- Created attachment 15747 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15747&action=edit better estimates Second patch for smaller estimates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on t

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #7 from Michael Matz --- Created attachment 15746 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15746&action=edit patch for improving error handling First patch that improves error handling. -- You are receiving this m

Issue 373568787: binutils:fuzz_nm: Invalid-bool-value in coff_find_nearest_line_with_names

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/373568787 Reference Info: 373568787 binutils:fuzz_nm: Invalid-bool-value in coff_find_nearest_line_with_names component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuz

Re: Issue 372093895: binutils:fuzz_dlltool: Null-dereference READ in _bfd_mips_elf_symbol_processing

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/372093895 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gs

Re: Issue 371546806: binutils:fuzz_nm: Null-dereference READ in bfd_hash_lookup

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/371546806 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gs

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #9 from Michael Matz --- So, I have two patches for you, see above. It would be nice to know that they work independendly, so if you could first test the first patch in isolation, so that we can know that the error handling now wo

[Bug ld/32260] regression: /bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.43.1 assertion fail ../../bfd/merge.c:247

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260 --- Comment #10 from Jonny Weir --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #9) > So, I have two patches for you, see above. It would be nice to know that > they work independendly, so if you could first test the first patch in > isolation, >