[Bug ld/32100] --rosegment moves the build-id note away from the start of the file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32100 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. That makes sense. Please go ahead and apply the patch to the branch. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: as aborts after buffer overflow

Hi Peter, I wanted to know how exactly gcc translates such expressions like n * 0x1001. People are talking about multiplication being not slower than any other arithmetic operation on modern processors, but in fact I got the code (n << 12) + n, no matter which form I used in the C source. OK, it

[Bug ld/32221] -z separate-code doesn't work correctly for many targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32221 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/32219] ELF orphan placement doesn't work well without .interp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/32219] ELF orphan placement doesn't work well without .interp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15722 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15722&action=edit Proposed patch Hi H.J. How about this proposed patch instead ? It modifies the orphan placement algo

[Bug ld/32221] -z separate-code doesn't work correctly for many targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32221 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32211 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32211 --- Comment #17 from Dan McDonald --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #16) > Hi Dan, > > (In reply to Dan McDonald from comment #15) > > 1.) Thank you for confirming there was a doc update and I should've RTFM > > more carefully. Ther

[Bug ld/32221] New: -z separate-code doesn't work correctly for many targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32221 Bug ID: 32221 Summary: -z separate-code doesn't work correctly for many targets Product: binutils Version: 2.44 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/32219] ELF orphan placement doesn't work well without .interp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- This patch removes .interp and uses .rodata for note sections instead: diff --git a/ld/ldelf.c b/ld/ldelf.c index 09691609fc0..b09ba054ed5 100644 --- a/ld/ldelf.c +++ b/ld/ldelf.c @@ -2121,9 +2121,6 @@ ldelf_pl

[Bug ld/32100] --rosegment moves the build-id note away from the start of the file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32100 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

Re: as aborts after buffer overflow

Hi Nick, Thank you, by omitting -ggdb I could now produce untruncated source lines and was able to locate easily the pieces of interest for me. If it always worked, then it could be all right: one build for the listings if they are needed, and another build for the debugger. But as you experienc

[Bug ld/32219] ELF orphan placement doesn't work well without .interp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ld/32100] --rosegment moves the build-id note away from the start of the file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32100 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Fixed by commit bf6d7087de0a7351fd1dfd5f41522a7f4f576180 Since this commit isn't backported to 2.43 branch, should we apply https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutil

[Bug ld/32219] ELF orphan placement doesn't work well without .interp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Created attachment 15722 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi H.J. > > How about this proposed patch instead ? > > It modifies the orphan placement algorithm to t

[Bug ld/32191] --rosegment places .note.gnu.property in executable PT_LOAD segment for -z separate-code

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32191 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0a71d78f6a6810db1816139e7a9af7d82bb8fb7a commit 0a71d78f6a6810db1816139e7a9af

[Bug ld/32191] --rosegment places .note.gnu.property in executable PT_LOAD segment for -z separate-code

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32191 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---