https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #28 from Luca Boccassi ---
As user and owner of the spec, I am fine with any of those options. A slight
preference for a new command line (option A), as that means you don't need to
worry about version matching - if the new flag is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #29 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
>
> Option A: Introduce a new --encoded-package-metadata parameter that takes
> the encoded string.
>
> Option B: Extend --package-metadata to always decode the given string. As
> previously discu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #27)
> Option A: Introduce a new --encoded-package-metadata parameter that takes
> the encoded string.
This option isn't readable.
> Option B: Extend --package-metada
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32067
--- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=602f5cf7e3a82229d75998a5f6eb13753f828bb3
commit 602f5cf7e3a82229d75998a5f6eb13753f828bb3
Au
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071
Bug ID: 32071
Summary: undefined weak hidden function symbols resolves to
garbage
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32067
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Thank you Alan and H.J.! I wasn't sure how to stop it getting there in the
first place.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32067
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
HJ, when looking at the loop setting non_ir_ref_regular, I noticed the test of
info->strip in determining whether to look at debug sections' relocs. That
seems wrong to me. Should you allow a debug referenc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32067
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
> HJ, when looking at the loop setting non_ir_ref_regular, I noticed the test
> of info->strip in determining whether to look at debug sections' relocs.
> That seems wro