[Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6

2024-07-29 Thread bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32018 --- Comment #13 from bigmagicreadsun --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #12) > Could you try this fix on CentOS: > > % diff --git a/gprofng/libcollector/hwprofile.c > b/gprofng/libcollector/hwprofile.c > index cfe0d84dc1e..3b7f4

[Bug gold/32032] dwp segfaults on hello world binary

2024-07-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32032 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=972092a9eda941a5744125f79fe58e52fb7007e4 commit 972092a9eda941a5744125f79fe58e52fb7007e4

[Bug binutils/31728] dlltool generates incorrect hints in import libraries

2024-07-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31728 --- Comment #23 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fb2a924990d3595c4b39cbcd37ebc36df761a3ad commit fb2a924990d3595c4b39cbcd37ebc36df761a3a

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug binutils/31728] dlltool generates incorrect hints in import libraries

2024-07-29 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31728 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > > [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$ ld y.o > > ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 00401000 > > ld: y.o: T

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > We would need a way to make it error out by default when invoked by GCC > then, given it exposed an x86 backend issue. I'm afraid I can't make the connection: These

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- Without it erroring out, how would something like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043 be found? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich --- By paying attention to the warning that I indicated would better be emitted instead. If need be (and if nothing like that exists yet), I'm sure ld could be taught to have behavior along the lines of the comp

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-07-29 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #9) > By paying attention to the warning that I indicated would better be emitted > instead. There's no way that's going to be effective when doing mass builds of real-

Issue 68710 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit

2024-07-29 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 68710 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=68710#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7

[Bug binutils/32035] New: heap overlfow in readelf (binutils/dwarf.c:3648)

2024-07-29 Thread jaehoon.jang at kaist dot ac.kr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32035 Bug ID: 32035 Summary: heap overlfow in readelf (binutils/dwarf.c:3648) Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Comp

[Bug gas/32037] RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0`

2024-07-29 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org,

[Bug gas/32037] New: RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0`

2024-07-29 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037 Bug ID: 32037 Summary: RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0` Product: binutils Version: 2.44 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1'

2024-07-29 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32036 --- Comment #1 from Nelson Chu --- The xventana cond extension are rv64 only since this patch, https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/fe0f44a0caf59db09ad4bc16a46926aba96ce60d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug gas/32037] RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0`

2024-07-29 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug binutils/32001] Untranslated part in error message of elfxx-riscv.c:2466

2024-07-29 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32001 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1'

2024-07-29 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32036 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org,

[Bug gas/32036] New: RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1'

2024-07-29 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32036 Bug ID: 32036 Summary: RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' Product: binutils Version: 2.44 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2