https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #2 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> It is done to ensure that PIE is loaded at the specific address which may
> be required for functional, performance or security purposes.
This does not match what all th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #3 from mintsuki ---
Also, when generating a shared object with -shared, without -pie, having a
non-0 base address does not affect the ELF file type, which is always ET_DYN.
If what you just said is true, then why is this the behav
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > It is done to ensure that PIE is loaded at the specific address which may
> > be required for functional, performance or securit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #3)
> Also, when generating a shared object with -shared, without -pie, having a
> non-0 base address does not affect the ELF file type, which is always
You can't load the mul
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #6 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > It is done to ensure that PIE is loaded at the specific address which may
> > > be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #7 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #3)
> > Also, when generating a shared object with -shared, without -pie, having a
> > non-0 base address does not affect the ELF file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #3)
> > > Also, when generating a shared object with -shared, without -pie, having a
> > > no
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > > It is done to ensure that PIE is load
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #10 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #7)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #3)
> > > > Also, when generating a shared obje
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #10)
> If this is policy, then I believe it should be properly documented
Updating document won't solve your debugging issue. Why does GDB have
no issues with PIE in user s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #12 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #10)
>
> > If this is policy, then I believe it should be properly documented
>
> Updating document won't solve your debugging issu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #14 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> Does PIE with zero load address cause any real problems for you?
Why not just answer the question? Whether it causes real problems for me or not
should be irrelevant t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
Here is the original discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/came9roojvfj-r3zbwpecpiulfcdrxprpayzcammxf3k7014...@mail.gmail.com/T/#m2cfa035c82e32ca865ec0f1c352b14470dcc7f39
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #16 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> Here is the original discussion:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMe9rOoJvfJ-
> r3zbwpecpiulfcdrxprpayzcammxf3k7014...@mail.gmail.com/T/
> #m2cfa035c82e32ca865ec0f1c3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #18 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> Fixed in 2.43 by:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;
> h=0daa17bf187cebd5b200f4fd5405cc55e75c391f
Thank you very much! I'll just finish off
18 matches
Mail list logo
