[Bug gas/31343] New: MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread syq at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 Bug ID: 31343 Summary: MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm? Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread syq at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 YunQiang Su changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk,

[Bug gas/31323] [x86] GAS does not error out instruction that exceed 15 bytes

2024-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31323 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0afc614c9938fbf5eda10a26c77d574c3c2f945a commit 0afc614c9938fbf5eda10a26c77d574c3c2f945a Au

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread macro at orcam dot me.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #1 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- The handling of R_MIPS_PC16 is correctly specified in the MIPS psABI to overflow at link time where applicable, so if the linker finds the value calculated for the symbol referred (whether it's absolut

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread syq at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #2 from YunQiang Su --- Thank you so much. I understand it now: It is used to branch to an absolute address with branch instructions. So it should never be used for PIC/PIE code? (if we want to add a more dynamic relocation) I t

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread syq at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #3 from YunQiang Su --- (In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #2) > Thank you so much. I understand it now: It is used to branch to an absolute > address with branch instructions. > > So it should never be used for PIC/PIE code? (

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

2024-02-06 Thread macro at orcam dot me.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Yes, it has to be a warning or error for PIC/PIE (whatever the BFD policy is here; I don't remember offhand). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/31346] New: [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 Bug ID: 31346 Summary: [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: NEW

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- This definitely sounds like a useful addition we will consider. We need to decide how to make this information available. This should also be in such a way that the gprofng tools that make use of gp-dis

[Bug gprofng/31347] New: [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31347 Bug ID: 31347 Summary: [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: NEW

[Bug gprofng/31347] [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31347 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/31347] [gp-display-text] Support a filter to select call stacks for a target function at a specified level

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31347 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/31346] [gp-display-text] For functions and methods show the level in the call stack in the relevant views

2024-02-06 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31346 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gas/31326] SCFI must handle non QWORD ALU with imm and MOV ops correctly

2024-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31326 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f8c50ae2703e6b67655b13b9766365ae3073fd15 commit f8c50ae2703e6b67655b13b9766365ae3073fd1