[Bug gas/30853] New: strange 'return column' register in CIE

2023-09-14 Thread eric.pouech at orange dot fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30853 Bug ID: 30853 Summary: strange 'return column' register in CIE Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ga

[Bug gas/30853] strange 'return column' register in CIE

2023-09-14 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30853 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- x86_dwarf2_return_column = (OUTPUT_FLAVOR == bfd_target_coff_flavour ? 32 : 16); COFF apparantly uses a different register numbering. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug gas/30853] strange 'return column' register in CIE

2023-09-14 Thread eric.pouech at orange dot fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30853 --- Comment #2 from Eric Pouech --- I see... that's why I suppose gcc doesn't rely on (g)as' cfi directives to emit its dwarf CFI bits (unless there's an option to tell x86_64-w64-mingw32-as to pick up another flavor, but couldn't find it eit

[Bug ld/30855] New: Bug 111420 - relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

2023-09-14 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 Bug ID: 30855 Summary: Bug 111420 - relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287' Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug ld/30855] Relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

2023-09-14 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 hiraditya changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Bug 111420 - relocation |Relocation truncated to

[Bug ld/30855] Relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

2023-09-14 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 hiraditya changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv64 Host|

[Bug ld/30855] Relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

2023-09-14 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 --- Comment #2 from hiraditya --- I got this error while building clang (ninja clang) on a riscv machine. root@lpi4a:~# gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug ld/30855] Relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

2023-09-14 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855 --- Comment #3 from AK --- To repro On a riscv64 machine $ cd llvm-project $ cmake -GNInja ../llvm -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=RISCV -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang $ ninja clang -- You are receivin

[Bug gas/30856] New: Regression: operand size mismatch for `push'

2023-09-14 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856 Bug ID: 30856 Summary: Regression: operand size mismatch for `push' Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Componen

[Bug ld/30844] ld riscv: --emit-relocs does not retain the original relocation type

2023-09-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 f