https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
I've been going down the wrong rabbit hole, I should have asked you at the
outset to post the result of your g++ command with -v added. That would have
shown your compiler is defaulting to PIEs while mine is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29072
--- Comment #22 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0ab7005043ee404dabfd690952efc25c35ae
commit 0ab7005043ee404dabfd690952
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30561
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #2)
> Still would you mind clarifying why
> "There is just not enough information in the input format to enable a
> proper conversion"?
Well for example, objcopy ha
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
Assi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30217
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dc808a2ebab337b5517add4c1aad298cf836c239
commit dc808a2ebab337b5517add4c1aad2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dc808a2ebab337b5517add4c1aad298cf836c239
commit dc808a2ebab337b5517add4c1aad2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=03f49a0619c5598eea80511efef5a88c4f7bb293
commit 03f49a0619c5598
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30217
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=03f49a0619c5598eea80511efef5a88c4f7bb293
commit 03f49a0619c5598
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 14940
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14940&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Nikita,
Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
--- Comment #11 from Gianfranco ---
thanks! I'll test shortly!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30573
Bug ID: 30573
Summary: riscv disassembler options are not documented in
manpage
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30566
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d8bcb8723602f03351ea583cbc9ba21f39054eb1
commit d8bcb8723602f03351ea583cbc9ba21f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30561
--- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> Well for example, objcopy has no way of determining whether the input binary
> contains code, data, or something else. So it is not at all obvious which
> secti
Updates:
Labels: Deadline-Approaching
Comment #2 on issue 57547 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe:
Heap-use-after-free in bfd_getl32
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57547#c2
This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically
der
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30575
Bug ID: 30575
Summary: gprofng cannot profile application with clone3()
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Compon
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30575
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536
--- Comment #12 from Gianfranco ---
Hello, testing was successful, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
19 matches
Mail list logo