[Bug gold/29980] New: error: undefined reference to plenty of exported symbols that are referenced as hidden symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29980 Bug ID: 29980 Summary: error: undefined reference to plenty of exported symbols that are referenced as hidden symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug ld/25694] R_RISCV_TPREL_HI20 relocations cause riscv64 to add TEXTREL bit on executables

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/29981] New: Non-existing references to init.texi still present after bfd_init move

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29981 Bug ID: 29981 Summary: Non-existing references to init.texi still present after bfd_init move Product: binutils Version: 2.41 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug libctf/29983] New: 2.36+ type confusion in outdated-input warning causes out-of-bounds access and possible overwrite

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983 Bug ID: 29983 Summary: 2.36+ type confusion in outdated-input warning causes out-of-bounds access and possible overwrite Product: binutils Version: 2.36 Status: NEW

[Bug libctf/29983] 2.36+ type confusion in outdated-input warning causes out-of-bounds access and possible overwrite

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nick.alcock at oracle dot com

[Bug binutils/29981] Non-existing references to init.texi still present after bfd_init move

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29981 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/29981] Non-existing references to init.texi still present after bfd_init move

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29981 --- Comment #3 from Pekka Seppänen --- Thanks, your version is indeed much, much better than my hacky proposal :) Also, tried it, and it working as expected (which is not a surprise) for both native and cross-compiler targets. -- You are r

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth -

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #25 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 14568 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14568&action=edit Augmented patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29935] Callers of Java 'itable stubs' are wrong on aarch64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29935 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Callers of Java 'itable |Callers of Java 'itable

[Bug binutils/29981] Non-existing references to init.texi still present after bfd_init move

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29981 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=18737d14799d609054994987dd75631430637a99 commit 18737d14799d609054994987dd756

[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #25) > Created attachment 14568 [details] > Augmented patch @@ -2853,9 +2866,18 @@ elf_i386_relocate_section (bfd *output_b relend

[Bug gprofng/29593] error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-11 Status|UN