[Bug binutils/25202] objcopy --verilog-data-width doesn't respect target's endianness

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Gökçe Aydos from comment #9) > I tested the patch (without the test). My remarks: Thanks for testing it. > 1) AFAIK memory addresses are byte addresses in gcc. If --verilog-data-width > is g

[Bug binutils/25202] objcopy --verilog-data-width doesn't respect target's endianness

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14433|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/29737] strip: section attributes to indicate strip or persistent sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29737 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Guillermo E. Martinez from comment #6) > Agree, of course!. What will be next step to start working on it? I have started a discussion on this topic on the gun-gabi mailing list. (Unfortunate

[Bug ld/29761] New: relocatable linking loses some symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 Bug ID: 29761 Summary: relocatable linking loses some symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug binutils/25202] objcopy --verilog-data-width doesn't respect target's endianness

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202 --- Comment #12 from Gökçe Aydos --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10) > >> As the file is read, each number encountered is assigned to a successive > >> word element of the memory. > > In that sentence, what exactly is meant by "

[Bug ld/29761] relocatable linking loses some symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Stat

[Bug binutils/25202] objcopy --verilog-data-width doesn't respect target's endianness

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202 --- Comment #13 from Olof Kindgren --- Great to see some activity on this! I haven't compiled and tested it myself yet, but I'm wondering if we got the addressing right. Nick, it's correct that we are dealing with word addresses, but are we ta

[Bug ld/29761] relocatable linking loses some symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/29761] relocatable linking loses some symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1db13039a7c410e89f00e379fe874d8532385e41 commit 1db13039a7c410e89f00e379fe874d85

[Bug gprofng/29763] New: [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Bug ID: 29763 Summary: [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gp

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com

[Bug gprofng/29763] [docs] The user guide needs to be expanded

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving thi

[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving thi

[Bug ld/29761] relocatable linking loses some symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 --- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev --- Thanks, that was quick! Interestingly, the symbol was not really excluded. It was still present in an nm output, but without a name. This makes me wonder, now, in case of a non-relocatable link when such sy