https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29646
Bug ID: 29646
Summary: Various warnings
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liska ---
Any progress on this please, it's still breaking i586 target?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29647
Bug ID: 29647
Summary: [Infinite Loop]: objdump(version 2.39.50.20221003,
commit e1fc9bcf)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29107
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at xry111 dot site
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29107
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> > Another wild guess - maybe adding the .NOTPARALLEL: pseudo-target to the
> > gprofng Makefile.am would help ? Just bef
Hi bjchan9an,
There is an uncontrolled stack recursion vulnerability in binutils-2.38, which
allows stack consumption in demangle_path_maybe_open_generics().
As Alan said, we are really only interested in bugs triggered by fuzzed binaries
if they are reported against the current mainline code
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29646
Kurt Goebel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29107
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |vladimir.mezentsev at
oracle do
Hi All,
We have problem to compile the following asm
https://godbolt.org/z/hejMPoW69
and asm error out with the subject message .
Is mrs for float special register not valid on cortex-a9 ?
Thank you
~Umesh
Hi All,
We have problem to compile the following asm
https://godbolt.org/z/hejMPoW69
and asm error out with the subject message .
Is mrs for float special register not valid on cortex-a9 ?
Thank you
~Umesh
On 03/10/2022 15:41, Umesh Kalappa via Binutils wrote:
Hi All,
We have problem to compile the following asm
https://godbolt.org/z/hejMPoW69
and asm error out with the subject message .
Is mrs for float special register not valid on cortex-a9 ?
Thank you
~Umesh
that's because the instruct
On 03/10/2022 16:48, Richard Earnshaw via Binutils wrote:
On 03/10/2022 15:41, Umesh Kalappa via Binutils wrote:
Hi All,
We have problem to compile the following asm
https://godbolt.org/z/hejMPoW69
and asm error out with the subject message .
Is mrs for float special register not valid o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29649
Bug ID: 29649
Summary: ld: Insufficient checking that BFD backend is suitable
for ld emulation on aarch64
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Updates:
Labels: Deadline-Approaching
Comment #2 on issue 49000 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objcopy: Direct-leak in
xcalloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49000#c2
This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically
derestricted within
Updates:
Labels: Deadline-Approaching
Comment #3 on issue 48997 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Null-dereference
READ in notes_calloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48997#c3
This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically
derestric
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 48768 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_ranlib_simulation:
Direct-leak in bfd_malloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48768#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline.
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 48766 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_addr2line: Direct-leak
in bfd_malloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=48766#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29579
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev
---
I have a fix.
I just started our tests.
If there will be no regression I send diffs for review tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Thank you Richard for the information and do you please point us to
the reference ,which states the same ?
Quick grep doesn't helped us ,Thank you again
~Umesh
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 9:24 PM Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/10/2022 16:48, Richard Earnshaw via Binutils wrote:
> >
> >
> > On
19 matches
Mail list logo
