https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28892
Bug ID: 28892
Summary: x86 OP_VEX use of uninitialised value
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binut
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28893
Bug ID: 28893
Summary: binutils-2.37: PGO build with Clang results in
configure error: AR with --plugin and rc is required
for LTO build
Product: binutils
Vers
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
Bug ID: 28894
Summary: segfault when building openjdk13 on x86 32bit
(binutils 2.38 regression)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.38
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28886
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
I have a CentOS system which does not have static glibc libraries installed
(specifically, no libc.a). With binutils 2.38 and the --enable-gold option,
make check fails because gold can't find libc.a.
Is this expected behavior? Are the static glibc libraries required for
gold's testing suite?
Wit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Stat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28892
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ce20459e162175710d8ef56118fc34edabfdce5e
commit ce20459e162175710d8ef56118fc34ed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28892
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.39
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
Pierre Labastie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre.labastie at neuf dot fr
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28897
--- Comment #1 from Fred Eisele ---
Created attachment 13982
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13982&action=edit
The CMakeList.txt for building the sample.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28897
--- Comment #2 from Fred Eisele ---
This affects several programs such as `ar.exe`, and `make.exe`.
In those cases it only shows up when a relative path is provided and the
combined length of that relative path and the path to the current wor
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #4 from Pierre Labastie ---
Problem is the compressed objs directory is ~240MB
I cannot attach it. Don't know I can reduce it, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #5 from Pierre Labastie ---
Created attachment 13983
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13983&action=edit
the object file where the failure occurs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #3 from Pierre Labastie ---
I have a similar issue with openjdk-17.0.2 (in a 32 bit VM):
/usr/bin/ld:
/sources/openjdk/jdk17u-jdk-17.0.2-ga/build/linux-x86-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/adaptiveSizePolicy.o:
war
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28897
Bug ID: 28897
Summary: bdf/bdfio.c does not properly detect "long paths"
containing ".."
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25713
Fred Eisele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fredrick.eisele at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #6 from Jan Palus ---
Confirmed that issue also occurs on glibc 2.34.
In my case command line is:
/usr/bin/i686-pld-linux-g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-z,relro
-Wl,-z,noexecstack -Wl,-O1 -march=i586 -m32 -Wl,--as-nee
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Palus from comment #6)
> Confirmed that issue also occurs on glibc 2.34.
>
> In my case command line is:
>
> /usr/bin/i686-pld-linux-g++ -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-z,relro
> -Wl,-z
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #9 from Pierre Labastie ---
To be complete, my toolchain is:
gcc-11.2.0, glibc-2.35, bintuils-2.38
I've installed binutils-2.37 and run the exact same command (that is, not
recompiling the object files). Still, I see the warning:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr28894]$ cat x.s
.text
addlfoo@INDNTPOFF, %eax
.section .tbss,"awT",@nobits
.globl foo
.hidden foo
foo:
.byte 0
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr28894]$ gcc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3319ba7a8d6a42ba071d691789bc184632399331
commit 3319ba7a8d6a42ba071d691789bc184
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ae1cab7d3f39686d9c7ddadbac297e9ae76ffccf
commit ae1cab7d3f39686d9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28894
--- Comment #15 from Jan Palus ---
Confirmed openjdk builds fine with above fix. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
26 matches
Mail list logo
