Comment #2 on issue 40280 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump:
Null-dereference READ in bfd_nonfatal_message
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40280#c2
This was an issue in the fuzzer itself, fix proposed and merge here:
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/commit/f2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
Bug ID: 28494
Summary: gold combines different aligned/padded SHT_NOTE
sections in the same PT_NOTE segment
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23535
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23535
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--
You are rec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27923
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||security-
CC|
Comment #3 on issue 40233 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_nm:
Heap-buffer-overflow in aout_get_external_symbols
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40233#c3
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/3f9661f12a42583c91655bc5c5b60542bcaed4e2
--
You received this messa
Comment #2 on issue 40248 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump:
Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_mach_o_arm_canonicalize_one_reloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40248#c2
I think a fix was made here
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/e02812494254b70fec6fa43
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
.note.gnu.property can't be placed between 2 other note sections with
different alignment:
[ 2] .note.ABI-tag NOTE0040028c 00028c 20 00 A
0 0 4
[ 3] .note.gnu.property NOTE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-October/118271.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28496
Bug ID: 28496
Summary: "make check" isn't clean
Product: binutils
Version: 2.38 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28497
Bug ID: 28497
Summary: "make check" isn't clean
Product: binutils
Version: 2.38 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28497
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"make check" isn't clean|"make check" isn't clean
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28441
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot
org
--- C
15 matches
Mail list logo