[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 --- Comment #3 from Rolf Eike Beer --- Still fails the same for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 --- Comment #4 from Nick Alcock --- That's extremely odd. What is the contents of /opt/emlix/test/sysroot/usr/lib? In particular, is libbfd.{so,a} of any description visible in there after the failed installation? Because it should be: bfd is

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 --- Comment #6 from Nick Alcock --- (... if Source Mage always removes packages before installing them, how does it install make or coreutils? I suppose I should download it and have a look!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 --- Comment #5 from Nick Alcock --- The Source Mage bug is probably a different problem again, and I think it's more a Source Mage problem really. It is in general not safe to remove toolchain binaries completely before 'make install' for prec

[Bug libctf/25155] libctf directory doesn't compile with MinGW

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360 pat at burned dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pat at burned dot com -- You

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/27990] New: ld --trace: Print the symbol which leads to archive extraction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27990 Bug ID: 27990 Summary: ld --trace: Print the symbol which leads to archive extraction Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug ld/27990] ld --trace: Print the symbol which leads to archive extraction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27990 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/27990] ld --trace: Print the symbol which leads to archive extraction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27990 --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- I'll add a comment that on Mach-O, ld64 -why_live gives you clue why a symbol is defined (via a potentially long archive member extraction chain). The --trace feature can make some other debugging tasks co

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 --- Comment #7 from Rolf Eike Beer --- There is a /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld.bfd, which belongs to the host binutils. Otherwise I'm doing a cross-build and a DESTDIR install, so there is nothing that could get overwritten and destroyed durin