https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13219
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13219&action=edit
binutils-gdb-fix-cet.patch
We debugged it in https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=686394 a bit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #3)
> Created attachment 13219 [details]
> binutils-gdb-fix-cet.patch
This patch is wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13218|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27407
Bug ID: 27407
Summary: Add --trace-symbols-from-file?
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27408
Bug ID: 27408
Summary: nm: Have a way to suppress 'no symbols'
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 13220 [details]
> An updated patch
>
> Try this.
The user reports it's building fine for them on i486:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/770061#c26
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27408
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Patch: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115340.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 13220 [details]
> > An updated patch
> >
> > Try this.
>
> The user reports it's building fine fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > > Created attachment 13220 [details]
> > > An updated patch
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #8)
>
> Do I understand correctly it's supposed to be decoded by old CPUs as:
> prefix=F3 (REP) escape="0F 1E" (Reserved-NOP) modrm(?)=FB
>
> Do you know when
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27409
Bug ID: 27409
Summary: ld flags -nodefaultlibs not recognized; -z
nodefaultlib does not provide the same result
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27409
Xingbo Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-elf-
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13220|0 |1
is obsolete|
13 matches
Mail list logo
