https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27190
Bug ID: 27190
Summary: m68k: fmovemx does not accept pc-relative addressing
modes for memory-to-register transfers
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCON
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2097
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27191
Bug ID: 27191
Summary: m68k: incorrect assembly of fmovem.l #data,%fpsr/%fpcr
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27191
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
The IMM form only allows a single destination register. Both insns should be
rejected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27191
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Otto ---
Are you sure about this? I can't find any indication for that in the manual.
Only register-direct are flagged as being allowed only for a single register.
And actually, that is instruction is emulated, an
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=75a933f39918ce4f4b9481234992895e022787ee
commit 75a933f39918ce4f4b9481234992895e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27192
Bug ID: 27192
Summary: conflicting CPU architectures 10/16 error on ARM
Product: binutils
Version: 2.34
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
Bug ID: 27193
Summary: GCC trunk unable to bootstrap with Binutils Trunk
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at sourceware dot org |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from David Edelso
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from David Edelso
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
I reproduced it:
/home/hjl/work/build/gnu/tools-build/x86_64-linux-toolchain/build-x86_64-linux//usr/toolchain-11.0.0/x86_64-linux/bin/ld:
/home/hjl/work/build/gnu/tools-build/x86_64-linux-toolchain/build-x86_6
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
/* Check if 2 sections define the same set of local and global
symbols. */
static bfd_boolean
bfd_elf_match_symbols_in_sections (asection *sec1, asection *sec2,
struct bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
--- Comment #7 from Matt Godbolt ---
Hi there,
It was failing until pretty recently. Our fix is to go back to 2.35.1 (which is
more sane).
Seems like you've been able to repro: please let me know if I can test
anything!
Cheers all, Matt
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|2.37|2.36
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #8 fro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
Bug ID: 27195
Summary: Error: file number less than one
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Ass
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #26 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=edf0f284b13293bb9740795131d18fe281139c48
commit edf0f284b13293bb9740795131d18fe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27193
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC trunk unable to |Linkonce section with
|bo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
A patc
28 matches
Mail list logo
