https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_33-branch branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=29e6ea430df6e315b2e76e8658c22c85cd2e5187
commit 2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_34-branch branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=33973d228c9bdaf36746e9e2d7c0b07c2eb0d2c3
commit 3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_35-branch branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3792ebe961f68438b06c0a0b4a731a38b666080c
commit 3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19
Assignee|unassign
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 12976
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12976&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26914
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22967
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Martin Liska from comment #9)
> Can't we just change behavior and properly mentioned that in release notes?
I think that that would be a bad idea. I suspect that there are scripts
out there
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26914
--- Comment #2 from Veit Devil ---
Hi Nick,
is binutils 2.35.1 not the latest version?
according to https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/ this is the latest version.
The following messages are displayed.
DWARF error: could not find variable spec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Created attachment 12977
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12977&action=edit
object file
I've attached the object file.
This is the minimized ld invocation that segfaults (tried
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26914
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Veit Devil from comment #2)
> is binutils 2.35.1 not the latest version?
Latest released version yes. But not the most recent development version.
The fixes that I mentioned are in the deve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a4eba6087d4cec81f8b41477b4da56ff87b88e91
commit a4eba6087d4cec81f8b41477b4d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26918
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26914
--- Comment #4 from Veit Devil ---
Hi Nick,
good, then I will wait for the next release version. Everything necessary for
your test should be in the appendix. Thank you.
Bye
Veit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979
--- Comment #7 from Veit Devil ---
Created attachment 12979
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12979&action=edit
Everything necessary for your test should be in the appendix. Thank you.
Everything necessary for your test
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26914
--- Comment #5 from Veit Devil ---
Created attachment 12980
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12980&action=edit
Everything necessary for your test should be in the appendix. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22967
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liska ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #9)
>
> > Can't we just change behavior and properly mentioned that in release notes?
>
> I think that that would be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
