https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26339
--- Comment #6 from David Spickett ---
> Is the tlbi instruction what was added in ARMv8.4 (tlb-rmi), or only certain
> operands?
(I'm reading this from the ARMARM for v8, "C6.2.328 TLBI")
tlbi is a sys instruction alias which I think means
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26302
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9b0ac51b22d0cf900f39e17e615bb22e32720f6e
commit 9b0ac51b22d0cf900f39e17e615bb22e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26028
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #8)
> I think this essentially means that users have to specify -W if they want to
> get some information from the output...
In my opinion though, this would be a goo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26357
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 12759
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12759&action=edit
Patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21351
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ccd9fae5d57b9a16d00d70d9dad916133ff1ea70
commit ccd9fae5d57b9a16d00d70d9dad
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21351
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26339
--- Comment #7 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(LLVM patch for memtag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85620).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 23942 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in
fuzz_readelf
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=23942#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriffbot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
There is this function som_bfd_copy_private_section_data() which is never
called but it looks like it should be called when objcopy is run. This is the
reason
container is NULL in the output section.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26356
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #2)
> There is this function som_bfd_copy_private_section_data() which is never
> called but it looks like it should be called when objcopy is run.
But it *is* call
10 matches
Mail list logo