Re: Possible bug in objdump

2020-06-11 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Joe, > The possible bug is explained in the comments near the beginning of the file > Bug.c Please could file a bug report using the binutils Bugzilla system here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=binutils When you do, it would be really helpful if you could include a

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug binutils/26111] New: Attempting free on address which was not malloc()

2020-06-11 Thread 15664243668 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26111 Bug ID: 26111 Summary: Attempting free on address which was not malloc() Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Com

[Bug binutils/26111] Attempting free on address which was not malloc()

2020-06-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26111 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/25447] objcopy : free() invalid pointer in _bfd_coff_free_symbols

2020-06-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25447 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||15664243668 at 163 dot com --- Comment #

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 12617 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12617&action=edit ld-elf/eh5 elfdump -u output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-11 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi Rainer, > >> I wonder how best to handle this: bfd/elfxx-sparc.c >> (_bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section) already silently ignores the overflow in a >> few select c

[Bug ld/25802] Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated to fit

2020-06-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 12618 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12618&action=edit ld-elf/eh5 readelf -wf output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26103] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when compiling with LTO on MinGW

2020-06-11 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26103 --- Comment #2 from Markus Böck --- Created attachment 12619 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12619&action=edit Symbols in ios.o of the working compiler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list fo

[Bug ld/26103] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when compiling with LTO on MinGW

2020-06-11 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26103 --- Comment #3 from Markus Böck --- Created attachment 12620 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12620&action=edit Symbols in ios.o of the compiler causing the assert in ld -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug ld/26103] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when compiling with LTO on MinGW

2020-06-11 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26103 --- Comment #4 from Markus Böck --- Using git bisect I managed to figure out which commit of GCC 9 has started causing the issue. I am confused as to how or why it would do so however. The first commit that causes this bug is: "PR libstdc++/86

[Bug binutils/26112] New: readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

2020-06-11 Thread tstellar at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 Bug ID: 26112 Summary: readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug gas/26113] New: gas 2.34 gets stuck in infinite loop after compilation error

2020-06-11 Thread me at tbrindus dot ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26113 Bug ID: 26113 Summary: gas 2.34 gets stuck in infinite loop after compilation error Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/26113] gas 2.34 gets hangs after compilation error

2020-06-11 Thread me at tbrindus dot ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26113 Tudor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gas 2.34 gets stuck in |gas 2.34 gets hangs after |

[Bug gas/26113] gas 2.34 hangs after compilation error

2020-06-11 Thread me at tbrindus dot ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26113 Tudor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gas 2.34 gets hangs after |gas 2.34 hangs after |compi

[Bug gas/26113] gas 2.34 hangs after compilation error

2020-06-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26113 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---