[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #28) > Created attachment 12358 [details] > test case for note warning > > This is a testcase for the warning about no note section. I think any shared > library compiled by cl

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #27) > Created attachment 12357 [details] > testcase for objcopy breakage > > This .so works fine, but if put through objcopy (even without flags), > objcopy will attempt to co

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-07 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #31 from Kaylee --- Yep, I'm not getting the warning with the new version. Also the test case that I mentioned failed appears to be ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d, which I think is probably unrelated. -- You are receiving this

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #31) > Yep, I'm not getting the warning with the new version. > > Also the test case that I mentioned failed appears to be > ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d, which I think is