Hi Gary,
It seems to work fine for me. Do you have a reproducer perhaps?
> cat test.s
.text
bx lr
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-as -march=armv4t test.s -o test.o
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-ld --fix-v4bx test.o -e0 -o test.exe
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -dr test.exe
test
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #34 from Martin Liška ---
I have one more question. It's a quite common case for me that that I do
testing of the built GCC :
$ export PATH=/home/marxin/bin/gcc/bin/:$PATH && export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/marxin/bin/gcc/lib64/:$LD_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537
Bug ID: 25537
Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Move machine type compatibility check
from emulation to the BFD
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517
Sergey Belyashov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12273|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25531
Sergey Belyashov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12282|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu ---
(
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #37 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Which liblto_plugin.so did nm load? Which liblto_plugin.so should nm load?
It loads the following plugin:
stat("/usr/bin/../lib64/bfd-plugins", 0x7fffd980) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #38 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #37)
> >
> > Which liblto_plugin.so did nm load? Which liblto_plugin.so should nm load?
>
> It loads the following plugin:
>
> stat("/usr/bin/../lib64/bfd-plugins", 0x7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #39 from Martin Liška ---
>
> What is wrong to use the matching lto-wrapper for the plugin being used?
It's probably fine. I'm just wondering how to use a locally install GCC to
cooperate fine with binutils.
--
You are receivin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #40 from Martin Liška ---
I will have to start using AR=gcc-ar, ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #39)
> >
> > What is wrong to use the matching lto-wrapper for the plugin being used?
>
> It's probably fine. I'm just wondering how to use a locally install GCC to
> co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
--- Comment #10 from Jan Beulich ---
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=5990e377e5a339bce715fabfc3e45b24b459a7af
I don't see a mechanism in the web interface though how to change a bug's
status, so I'm lea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 20039 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Direct-leak in
wasm_scan
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20039#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriffbot
-
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 20043 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20043#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriffbot
--
You
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #2 on issue 20068 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disassemble:
Undefined-shift in print_insn
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20068#c2
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25539
Bug ID: 25539
Summary: fix-loongson3-llsc cannot produce `sync` when there
are multi label at the same address
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25540
Bug ID: 25540
Summary: using the same filename for MAP and DLL fails silently
with file corruption
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25540
Dan Raymond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at martin dot st
--
You are rec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25541
Bug ID: 25541
Summary: linking twice to the same msvc import library produces
an invalid IAT
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25541
Dan Raymond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at martin dot st
--
You are rec
23 matches
Mail list logo