[Bug binutils/25355] nm reports a variable as "T" with -flto and -fno-common

2020-02-06 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru,

[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF

2020-02-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Sergey Belyashov from comment #9) Hi Sergey, > Created attachment 12259 [details] Ummm, this version appears to delete the ld/elmulparams/z80elf.em file entirely. That cannot be right, can i

[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF

2020-02-06 Thread sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 --- Comment #11 from Sergey Belyashov --- Yes. z80.em contains all necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/23932] integer overflow causes an endless loop

2020-02-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23932 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 12265 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12265&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Anthony, Hmm, OK, please could you try out this patch and let me know if the resuling

[Bug binutils/23932] integer overflow causes an endless loop

2020-02-06 Thread green at moxielogic dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23932 --- Comment #6 from Anthony Green --- Thanks, Nick. I've tested this patch and it solves the problem. Please apply at your earliest convenience! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/25355] nm reports a variable as "T" with -flto and -fno-common

2020-02-06 Thread niveditas98 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355 Arvind Sankar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||niveditas98 at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug gold/24526] [gold] Generalize GC support for SHF_LINK_ORDER

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24526 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae0182900de3e commit b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae018

[Bug gas/25381] Support section flag 'o' (SHF_LINK_ORDER)

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae0182900de3e commit b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae018

[Bug ld/25021] Garbage collecting non-alloc SHF_LINK_ORDER sections

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25021 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae0182900de3e commit b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae018

[Bug ld/25490] __patchable_function_entries section doesn't work with --gc-sections

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25490 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae0182900de3e commit b7d072167715829eed0622616f6ae018

[Bug gas/25381] Support section flag 'o' (SHF_LINK_ORDER)

2020-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25021] Garbage collecting non-alloc SHF_LINK_ORDER sections

2020-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25021 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25490] __patchable_function_entries section doesn't work with --gc-sections

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25490 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5242a0a000ad7d3f2fa1cd0023f692d53261b302 commit 5242a0a000ad7d3f2fa1cd0023f692d5

[Bug gas/25381] Support section flag 'o' (SHF_LINK_ORDER)

2020-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381 Bug 25381 depends on bug 25490, which changed state. Bug 25490 Summary: __patchable_function_entries section doesn't work with --gc-sections https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25490 What|Removed

[Bug ld/25490] __patchable_function_entries section doesn't work with --gc-sections

2020-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25490 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25022] Make /DISCARD/ discard SHF_LINK_ORDER sections

2020-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25022 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9b538ba71fc7dbab65371e3e4e5f7e093ff25023 commit 9b538ba71fc7dbab65371e3e4e5f7e09

[Bug ld/25022] Make /DISCARD/ discard SHF_LINK_ORDER sections

2020-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25022 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Issue 20558 in oss-fuzz

2020-02-06 Thread amo… via monorail
The following issue was updated: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20558#c1 -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to ad