https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25210
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19543 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in aarch64_wide_constant_p
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19543#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19531 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in bpf_cgen_extract_operand
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19531#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #4 on issue 19529 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_instruction
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19529#c4
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the pu
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19532 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in nds32_mask_opcode
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19532#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the pu
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #2 on issue 19584 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_insn_visium
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19584#c2
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the pu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416
Bug ID: 25416
Summary: TLSDESC relaxation doesn
Product: binutils
Version: 2.34 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TLSDESC relaxation doesn|TLSDESC relaxation doesn't
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
For x32, we must encode "lea x@TLSDESC(%rip), %eax" with a REX prefix
even if it isn't required. Otherwise linker can’t safely perform
GDesc -> LE optimization.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are