[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 11987 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11987&action=edit Test binary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug gas/24991] the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on arm thumb2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/24991] the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on arm thumb2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991 --- Comment #2 from Mikulas Patocka --- Created attachment 11988 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11988&action=edit Compiler output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug gas/24991] the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on arm thumb2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991 --- Comment #3 from Mikulas Patocka --- Created attachment 11989 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11989&action=edit Assembler output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/24991] the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on arm thumb2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991 --- Comment #4 from Mikulas Patocka --- Created attachment 11990 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11990&action=edit Linker output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug gas/24991] the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on arm thumb2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991 --- Comment #5 from Mikulas Patocka --- I've attached the files. It is both the compiler and assembler bug - the compiler generates out of range jump and the assembler incorrectly assembles it as a backward jump. -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/24907] Objdump produces wrong branch opcode interpretation in some cases

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24907 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0a4632b5637fa63ea4dc7651cdbae21e8b7005cd commit 0a4632b5637fa63ea4dc7651cdbae

[Bug ld/24992] New: RISC-V: partial relaxing against global pointer with sdata section alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24992 Bug ID: 24992 Summary: RISC-V: partial relaxing against global pointer with sdata section alignment Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug binutils/24993] New: RISC-V: Address 0x00000000000xxxxx is out of bounds when "objdump -D"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24993 Bug ID: 24993 Summary: RISC-V: Address 0x000x is out of bounds when "objdump -D" Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug ld/24992] RISC-V: partial relaxing against global pointer with sdata section alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24992 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/24993] RISC-V: Address 0x00000000000xxxxx is out of bounds when "objdump -D"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24993 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/24983] RISC-V GP linker relaxation is not performed with -nostdlib

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24983 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yitingwang16 at outlook dot com --- Comm

[Bug ld/24992] RISC-V: partial relaxing against global pointer with sdata section alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24992 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---