[Bug ld/24689] string table corruption

2019-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24689 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=14b2a8e4244a29208ad430167860a0f01b20f215 commit 14b2a8e4244a29208ad430167860a

[Bug ld/24704] [2.33 Regression] Internal error building skiboot for powerpc64-linux-gnu

2019-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24704 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bb22a41815facfaa3de621aad5d055eb8e477082 commit bb22a41815facfaa3de621aad5d05

[Bug ld/24723] New: Linker fails with "too many open files"

2019-06-23 Thread benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24723 Bug ID: 24723 Summary: Linker fails with "too many open files" Product: binutils Version: 2.32 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/24723] Linker fails with "too many open files"

2019-06-23 Thread benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24723 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Redelings --- Created attachment 11860 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11860&action=edit An strace log of the linker running out of open files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug ld/24704] [2.33 Regression] Internal error building skiboot for powerpc64-linux-gnu

2019-06-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24704 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/24718] Unresolved weak dependency on a versioned symbol should not prevent a program from running

2019-06-23 Thread carlos at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24718 --- Comment #9 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #8) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > > > I would say this is a static link editor limitation. It has to mark symbol > > versions as weak if the

[Bug ld/24718] Unresolved weak dependency on a versioned symbol should not prevent a program from running

2019-06-23 Thread carlos at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24718 --- Comment #10 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #8) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > > > I would say this is a static link editor limitation. It has to mark symbol > > versions as weak if th

[Bug ld/24718] Unresolved weak dependency on a versioned symbol should not prevent a program from running

2019-06-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24718 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug ld/24718] Unresolved weak dependency on a versioned symbol should not prevent a program from running

2019-06-23 Thread fweimer at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24718 --- Comment #12 from Florian Weimer --- says this: vna_flags Bitmask of flags. Currently the following are defined: VER_FLG_WEAK the reference to this version is weak. I b