https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #14 from nsz at port70 dot net ---
> @Szabolcs: If you rebuild gcc-8 on Debian testing with "--enable-cet=auto"
> added to CONFARGS in debian/rules2, then you should be able to reproduce the
> musl-gcc crash (after removing the --bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #14)
> > @Szabolcs: If you rebuild gcc-8 on Debian testing with "--enable-cet=auto"
> > added to CONFARGS in debian/rules2, then you should be able to reproduce the
> > musl-gcc cr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #16 from Evangelos Foutras ---
The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both binutils
master (1dc9e2d6) and binutils-2_31-branch (6ee91b1e). No change at all in the
resulting binary, compared to just the pat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ab9e342807d132182892de1be1a92d6e91a5c1da
commit ab9e342807d132182892de1be1a92d6
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #16)
> The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both
> binutils master (1dc9e2d6) and binutils-2_31-branch (6ee91b1e). No change at
> all in t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428
--- Comment #19 from Evangelos Foutras ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18)
> (In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #16)
> > The test case from comment #14 is still reproducible for me with both
> > binutils master (1dc9e2d6) and b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23515
Bug ID: 23515
Summary: Empty GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND isn't removed
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
