[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Baumann --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Please try binutils-2_30-branch Same effect. Can I give you the value of some structures or so? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list f

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4bba0fb1c6d391a217c25e44398a7e1c7090155f commit 4bba0fb1c6d391a217c25e44398a7

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- The patch I've just committed improves the handling of these bad object files. The question remains as to how they were created. Please identify the binutils version used to create object_1_257.o. -- Yo

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-18 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 --- Comment #2 from Sudakshina Das --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/m

[Bug binutils/23107] 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets

2018-05-18 Thread ant.bikineev at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107 --- Comment #2 from ant.bikineev at gmail dot com --- Hi Nick! > Would you care to update your patch to do this ? Sure, I've just updated the changes in accordance with your notes. Thanks for them. -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug binutils/23107] 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets

2018-05-18 Thread ant.bikineev at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107 ant.bikineev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10972|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andreas Baumann from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > Please try binutils-2_30-branch > > Same effect. Please try https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-05/msg00182.html

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Baumann --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to Andreas Baumann from comment #2) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > > Please try binutils-2_30-branch > > > > Same effect. > > Please try

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- I can build glibc 2.27 on i686. Please provide ALL linker inputs so that I can reproduce it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/23201] New: Unnecessary dynamic relocations for HIDDEN/PROVIDE_HIDDEN symbols

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23201 Bug ID: 23201 Summary: Unnecessary dynamic relocations for HIDDEN/PROVIDE_HIDDEN symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=011b32fd4270fb7111ee1f63695ccd44562ee7df commit 011b32fd4270fb7111ee1f63695ccd44

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread thomas.mader at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Mader --- The dmd compiler doesn't seem to be using any binutils except for linking. https://forum.dlang.org/post/lvxvkopqssytuxzzc...@forum.dlang.org So it's still a question as to why the problem occurs only with

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Baumann --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > I can build glibc 2.27 on i686. Please provide ALL linker inputs > so that I can reproduce it. Hope this helps: gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o /root/g

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andreas Baumann from comment #6) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > > I can build glibc 2.27 on i686. Please provide ALL linker inputs > > so that I can reproduce it. > > Hope this helps: >

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Baumann --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) > (In reply to Andreas Baumann from comment #6) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > > > I can build glibc 2.27 on i686. Please provide ALL linker inputs > >

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andreas Baumann from comment #8) > COMPILER_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/8.1.0/:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc- > linux-gnu/8.1.0/:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux- > gnu/8.1

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Baumann --- Created attachment 11029 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11029&action=edit ld.map -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Baumann --- Created attachment 11030 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11030&action=edit librtld.os -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Assignee|unassigned at source

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Host|i68

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=97373b2eba6077d5059370a95931b93a8b118813 commit 97373b2eba6077d5059370a95931b93

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e3d435293f0dd45247e8057574389f322f5fe5a2 commit e3d435293f0dd45