https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22592
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832
Bug ID: 22832
Summary: 2.30 internal error, aborting at
../../bfd/elflink.c:9710 in elf_link_output_extsym
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22829
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|objcopy/strip: PT_GNU_RELRO |objcopy/strip: PT_GNU_RELRO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22829
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22592
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Pl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22833
Bug ID: 22833
Summary: gold: --print-symbol-counts incorrect output ?
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Compone
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831
--- Comment #2 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ---
hi HJ, thanks for that advice - bear in mind that i am not actually
directly involved in any of the projects that are experiencing these
insane levels of thrashing. we (you and i) are there
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The GOT relocation issue I just fixed (on master, 2.30 and 2.29 branch) can
have pretty much unpredictable results since it may cause memory corruption.
Please retry with updated sources containing the fi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22592
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22592
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The only problem I've seen with this patch is that it now over-allocates
> relocations for the GOT.
We generate the same number of GOT relocations as 2.28 and below though.
--
You are receiving this m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
While the patch from a8735c82b8519d8b18915765ca983fc07154a17d was actually
still missing and using a binutils with the patch actually fixed another build
issue with rustc for me, this particula
Hello there,
bfd/elf32-nds32.c:9693]: (warning) Redundant assignment of 'irel->r_addend' to
itself.
Source code is
rel->r_offset = rel->r_offset;
Suggest code rework.
Regards
David Binderman
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.or
Hello there,
bfd/elf32-arc.c:1537]: (warning) Redundant assignment of 'rel->r_offset' to
itself.
Source code is
rel->r_offset = rel->r_offset;
Suggest code rework.
Regards
David Binderman
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ---
While it fixes the two failing ld testcases, during a gcc mainline
bootstrap I get man errors:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr47793.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/bin/gld-2.30.51-tls: BFD (GNU Binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 10807
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10807&action=edit
assembler output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22829
--- Comment #5 from NGG ---
This is not an enhancement request, it is clearly a bug.
The ELF header is perfectly valid the way lld creates it, and strip reduces its
security.
This is why Chromium on Android switched to elfutils strip (see
htt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
> While it fixes the two failing ld testcases, during a gcc mainline
> bootstrap I get man errors:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr47793.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22829
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 10808
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10808&action=edit
prospective patch
The importance fields are for use by binutils maintainers. They are not for
users to flag
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22829
--- Comment #7 from NGG ---
Thank you for the quick response and patch proposal.
Sorry for overreacting. I assigned it to critical due to its possible security
implications and because of the wide range of products it might affect. I
should h
23 matches
Mail list logo
