[Bug ld/22749] New: Bad alignment and padding of .note.gnu.property

2018-01-26 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22749 Bug ID: 22749 Summary: Bad alignment and padding of .note.gnu.property Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug ld/22749] Bad alignment and padding of .note.gnu.property

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22749 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug ld/22751] New: LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread jcowgill+sourceware at jcowgill dot uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 Bug ID: 22751 Summary: LTO broken for libgcc libcalls Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/22750] New: .sizeof. directive is handled incorrectly in shared object

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22750 Bug ID: 22750 Summary: .sizeof. directive is handled incorrectly in shared object Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/22750] .sizeof. directive is handled incorrectly in shared object

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22750 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is Relocation section '.rela.data' at offset 0x100 contains 1 entry: Offset Info Type Sym. ValueSym. Name + Addend 00050001 R_X86_64_64 000

[Bug ld/22750] .sizeof. directive is handled incorrectly in shared object

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22750 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/22751] LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/22741] objcopy segfault

2018-01-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22741 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/22751] LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org -- You are r

[Bug ld/22751] LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|amodra at gm

[Bug ld/22751] LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug ld/22751] LTO broken for libgcc libcalls

2018-01-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22751 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Reverting 1fa4ec6ae7 makes no difference. Indeed, now that I've refreshed my memory on what that patch does, it should not since all it is doing (or at least supposed to be doing!) is reordering the layout o