[Bug gas/22598] [RISCV] No way to disable two-instruction sequences for branch or relocation for jal instructions

2018-01-10 Thread asb at lowrisc dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598 --- Comment #9 from Alex Bradbury --- I certainly agree that treating immediate arguments to branch/jump instructions as absolute is consistent with the handling of labels. It seems that at least in the case of Mips, this behaviour is inconsi

[Bug gas/22598] [RISCV] No way to disable two-instruction sequences for branch or relocation for jal instructions

2018-01-10 Thread asb at lowrisc dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598 --- Comment #10 from Alex Bradbury --- Actually I was too quick to respond, it doesn't seem that GNU as is treating immediate arguments to branches in MIPS as absolute addresses: $ cat test.s lab: beq $6, $7, 128 bne $4, $5, 64 beq $6, $7, 12

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

2018-01-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- The question is - does the patch work ? I am happy to apply it, provided that it can be confirmed that it works in a real ARM-based system. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: Translatable strings not marked 'c-format'

2018-01-10 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ask, > Meanwhile, do we disable the strings that have translation errors? > There are currently 6 affected languages, and we need only mark the > relevant strings as 'fuzzy' in each po-file. It would be bad to let > the errors remain in a version that is to be shipped soon. I think that that

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-10 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #17 from Nick Cli

[Bug gas/22598] [RISCV] No way to disable two-instruction sequences for branch or relocation for jal instructions

2018-01-10 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598 --- Comment #11 from Jim Wilson --- You must be careful when interpreting an unrelocated object file. The relocation 0: R_MIPS_PC16 *ABS* makes it clear that you have a zero-based absolute address in the branch. The disassembler is

[Bug gold/22694] New: [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

2018-01-10 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 Bug ID: 22694 Summary: [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized Product: binutils Version: 2.29 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gol

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

2018-01-10 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

2018-01-10 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- not seen on x86, arm* and s390x archs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@g

[Bug ld/22696] New: Wrong order of SHLIB_RODATA_ADDR in elf.sc?

2018-01-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22696 Bug ID: 22696 Summary: Wrong order of SHLIB_RODATA_ADDR in elf.sc? Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug ld/22589] aarch64: adrp relocation gets filled with non-zero address for undefined weak symbol

2018-01-10 Thread jwerner at chromium dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22589 Julius Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug ld/22677] ld -r --gc-section does not KEEP .init_array/.fini_array

2018-01-10 Thread d+sourcew...@adaptive-enterprises.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 --- Comment #3 from David Leonard --- Hi Nick, > This appears to be an artifact of the linker that you are using. If you > build an x86_64 linker using the FSF sources and run "ld --verbose" you > should see this as part of the output You a

[Bug ld/22696] Wrong order of SHLIB_RODATA_ADDR in elf.sc?

2018-01-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22696 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

2018-01-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gold/22694] [2.30 Regression] -fuse-ld=gold not recognized

2018-01-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22694 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Incidentally, if you add -v -Wl,-v to the xgcc command line you should see collect2 being invoked with -fuse-ld=gold. collect2 ought to eat that option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on t

[Bug binutils/22699] New: sh*: Immediate signedness is incorrect in and/or/tst/xor #imm

2018-01-10 Thread achurch+sourceware at achurch dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22699 Bug ID: 22699 Summary: sh*: Immediate signedness is incorrect in and/or/tst/xor #imm Product: binutils Version: 2.29 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal