[Bug ld/20932] LD: Internal error during record link assignment

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20932 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jonathon.Reinhart at gmail dot com ---

[Bug ld/20832] String merging elf32-i386 object files with elf64-x86-64 ld causes incorrect results

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20832 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20811] strip not stripped in the dynamic table

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20811 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug admin/22239] New: invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)

2017-10-03 Thread ago at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239 Bug ID: 22239 Summary: invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c) Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug admin/22239] invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)

2017-10-03 Thread ago at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10499 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10499&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

-mfence-as-lock-add option in binutils 2.27

2017-10-03 Thread Parul Chahar
Hi, I found that a new option "-mfence-as-lock-add" is added in binutils 2.27. It generate lock instruction when "-mfence-as-lock-add=yes". Otherwise, mfence, lfence, sfence is generated. Please let me know why this option is required. Why lock instruction is needed. Thanks, Parul ___

[Bug binutils/22240] New: hang of the objdump process

2017-10-03 Thread ago at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 Bug ID: 22240 Summary: hang of the objdump process Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutil

[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process

2017-10-03 Thread ago at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- also the process uses the 100% of the cpu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binu

Re: -mfence-as-lock-add option in binutils 2.27

2017-10-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Parul Chahar writes: > I found that a new option "-mfence-as-lock-add" is added in binutils 2.27. > It generate lock instruction when "-mfence-as-lock-add=yes". Otherwise, > mfence, lfence, sfence is generated. > > Please let me know why this option is required. Why lock instruction is > needed.

[Bug binutils/22245] New: Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread kryukov at frtk dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Bug ID: 22245 Summary: Potential UB in bfd_set_error Product: binutils Version: 2.29 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread kryukov at frtk dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #1 from Pavel I. Kryukov --- Created attachment 10503 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10503&action=edit Fix potential UB in bfd_set_error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug gas/21167] gas v2.28.51 does not include .rel[a] sections to groups

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21167 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9ba5f27cdd15d22d6c5739ff5d2b1c81d796e114 commit 9ba5f27cdd15d22d6c5739ff5d2b1

[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_29-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99ca76d3db25af8e017d7d54df677db0561907f5 commit 99ca76d3db25af8

[Bug binutils/22245] Potential UB in bfd_set_error

2017-10-03 Thread kryukov at frtk dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22245 Pavel I. Kryukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---