https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Try linking with -Wl,-t to see whether the libraries you expect are in fact
being searched.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21949
Bug ID: 21949
Summary: asdasd
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21950
Bug ID: 21950
Summary: Hacked By KingSkrupellos Cyberizm.Org Digital Security
Technological Turkish Moslem Army
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #4 from Brett Neumeier ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Here is a small testcase:
>
> [hjl@gnu-6 config]$ cat /tmp/p.i
> static char output_invalid_buf[sizeof (unsigned char) * 2 + 5];
>
> char *
> output_invalid (int
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #5 from Brett Neumeier ---
Created attachment 10340
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10340&action=edit
result of minimal test-case compilation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Brett Neumeier from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > Here is a small testcase:
> >
> > [hjl@gnu-6 config]$ cat /tmp/p.i
> > static char output_invalid_buf[sizeof (unsigned ch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
Brett Neumeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bneumeier at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #8 from Brett Neumeier ---
Created attachment 10342
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10342&action=edit
compressed pre-processed tc-i386.c source, exhibiting the issue
This is the result of running the failin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #9 from Brett Neumeier ---
Created attachment 10343
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10343&action=edit
attempt at minimal pre-processed tc-i386.i
OK, one more thing. I deleted everything that seemed to be un
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21949
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21950
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Brett Neumeier from comment #9)
> Created attachment 10343 [details]
> attempt at minimal pre-processed tc-i386.i
>
> OK, one more thing. I deleted everything that seemed to be unreferenced by
> o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Brett Neumeier from comment #9)
> Created attachment 10343 [details]
> attempt at minimal pre-processed tc-i386.i
>
> OK, one more thing. I deleted everything that seemed to be unreferenced by
> o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> How did you manage to avoid "discarding zero address range FDE" (see
> elf-eh-frame.c) for foo.so? If I use --traditional-format to avoid eh_frame
> editing then I see
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
My point was that elf-eh-frame.c discards the zero range FDE, and foo.so ends
up with an empty .eh_frame. Which is not what you reported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Also, your foo.eh shows a range of 1 for the FDE. How did that happen?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binuti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4)
> Also, your foo.eh shows a range of 1 for the FDE. How did that happen?
foo.so and bar.so have very similar contents.
Both are built from foo.o and bar.o, but with
dif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Silly me. I didn't follow the recipe, just build foo.so from foo.o and bar.so
from bar.o.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
19 matches
Mail list logo
