https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #2 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
==23762==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix.cc:66 "(("unable
to mmap" && 0)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 0xb72f94c1 (/usr/lib/i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #3 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
Created attachment 10328
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10328&action=edit
oom-objdump3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #1 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
Created attachment 10327
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10327&action=edit
testcase2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
Bug ID: 21929
Summary: memory exhaustion
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Ass
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10327|testcase2 |oom-objdump2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10326|testcase|oom-objdump1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #4 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
==8747==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix.cc:66 "(("unable
to mmap" && 0)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 0xb72244c1 (/usr/lib/i3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #4 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
==8747==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix.cc:66 "(("unable
to mmap" && 0)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 0xb72244c1 (/usr/lib/i3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #6 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
Created attachment 10329
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10329&action=edit
oom-objdump4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--- Comment #7 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
==6728==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix.cc:66 "(("unable
to mmap" && 0)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 0xb728a4c1 (/usr/lib/i3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931
Bug ID: 21931
Summary: glibc 2.26 Exception handling problem on powerpc
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21933
Bug ID: 21933
Summary: heap buffer overflow in elf_read_notes
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
Bug ID: 21934
Summary: gas build fails when using gcc 7
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21935
Bug ID: 21935
Summary: gas build error when using gcc 7
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21933
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
*** Bug 21935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils maili
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21935
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
Hi H.J.
> Why don't I see on i386 cross to x86_64? We have
No idea. I was wondering that too.
> static char output_invalid_buf[sizeof (unsigned char) * 2 + 6];
>
> It has 8 bytes, not 5.
But the printing of the value starts three bytes into the buffer
which is why gcc says that there are only
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17618
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=978c05401b0f0ac7a94cca7db19b1dec0c5bd698
commit 978c05401b0f0ac7a94cca7db19b1dec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21934
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Here is a small testcase:
[hjl@gnu-6 config]$ cat /tmp/p.i
static char output_invalid_buf[sizeof (unsigned char) * 2 + 5];
char *
output_invalid (int c)
{
__builtin_snprintf (output_invalid_buf, sizeof (ou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21933
--- Comment #2 from Zhihua Yao <499671216 at qq dot com> ---
my configure:
CC="afl-gcc" CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsanitize=address"
./configure --disable-shared
The command to trigger the vulnerability is "objdump -S heapbuffe
23 matches
Mail list logo
