[Bug ld/21532] AArch64: Symbol address inconsistency across compilation units

2017-06-06 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21532 --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang --- Hi Nick, Looks like AArch64 could avoid emiting COPY relocation if it's a relocation against writable section. We could adopt similar code from elf_x86_64_adjust_dynamic_symbol or ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_

[Bug ld/21532] AArch64: Symbol address inconsistency across compilation units

2017-06-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21532 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jiong, Thanks for taking a look at this. >Looks like AArch64 could avoid emiting COPY relocation if it's a relocation > against writable section. We could adopt similar code from > elf_x86_64_adj

[Bug ld/21532] AArch64: Symbol address inconsistency across compilation units

2017-06-06 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21532 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug ld/19579] [Regression] link error linking fortran code with PIE

2017-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579 --- Comment #25 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0ee3a6dbd06b88a4e02f3f46c3ec036fd951400b commit 0ee3a6dbd06b88a4e02f3f46c3

[Bug binutils/21546] [objdump] Support PE EXE/DLL Import Tables with zero in Hint Table

2017-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21546 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9949827bea788753c29b7bb503d6d5dda6ea21ff commit 9949827bea788753c29b7bb503d

[Bug binutils/21546] [objdump] Support PE EXE/DLL Import Tables with zero in Hint Table

2017-06-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21546 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-06-06 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #10 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > Hi Casey, > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 > > > Someone on the GNU ARM Embedded Toolchain project mentioned I should as