https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9641
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9641&action=edit
Compressed a,out that seg-faults
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Ma,
(In reply to ma.jiang from comment #9)
> Yes, the elf standard does not require " the program headers be contained
> in a program segment". But, now that the generated elf have a PT_PHDR
> segmen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
Bug ID: 20833
Summary: x32 kernel build error
Product: binutils
Version: 2.28 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815
--- Comment #12 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
Created attachment 9643
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9643&action=edit
the invalid elf
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11)
Hi Nick,
I have checked your fil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20834
Bug ID: 20834
Summary: ld.gold on armel uses small page size, decreasing
portability
Product: binutils
Version: 2.28 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20834
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20832
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 9644
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9644&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 9644 [details]
> A patch
>
> Try this.
Works fine. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Technically, gold is correct to complain relocation overflow.
But vvar_vsyscall_gtod_data is in vvar page which is placed before
vdso page:
7fffe89d8000-7fffe89da000 r--p 00:00 0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675
--- Comment #6 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Thanks Nick for looking into this.
I think the patch is the best we can do for now.
It seems more likely a gcc bug then a uClibc-ng problem.
I can do the static toolchain test builds for all other
12 matches
Mail list logo