[Bug ld/20694] New: PDP11 TARGET_PAGE_SIZE is incorrect

2016-10-17 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20694 Bug ID: 20694 Summary: PDP11 TARGET_PAGE_SIZE is incorrect Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC

2016-10-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC

2016-10-17 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 --- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > (In reply to Igor Kozhukhov from comment #0) > > > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:75: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.volatile' > > ./crt/_rtbootld.s:245: Error: unknown pseu

Re: [Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC

2016-10-17 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Igor, >> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the > your solution doesn't work. > GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax > we can use -no-relax Oops - I had too many dashes, sorry about that. > - but it is not fixed my problem Well, it does

[Bug gas/20692] gas failed on SPARC

2016-10-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Igor, >> You could try adding "-D.volatile= -D.nonvolatile= -Wa,--no-relax" to the > your solution doesn't work. > GAS command line on SPARC not accepted -Wa,--no-relax > we can use -no-relax Oops -

[Bug gold/20693] kernel build error on ppc64le

2016-10-17 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20693 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It happens on all archs with an empty archive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list

[Bug binutils/20699] New: [libopcodes][x86] Decodes invalid 32-bit address for a 64-bit MPX instruction

2016-10-17 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20699 Bug ID: 20699 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Decodes invalid 32-bit address for a 64-bit MPX instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug binutils/19660] [libopcodes] [x86] REP prefixes shown incorrectly

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19660 --- Comment #6 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- The fact that the rep prefixes cannot be used with these opcodes is not the same as machine dependencies. This instruction will be invalid everywhere, so it should be decoded as invalid. -- You

[Bug binutils/20700] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20700 Bug ID: 20700 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Bug binutils/20701] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for phaddw instruction

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20701 Bug ID: 20701 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for phaddw instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/20702] New: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret instruction due to data16 prefix

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20702 Bug ID: 20702 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret instruction due to data16 prefix Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug gas/20703] New: [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703 Bug ID: 20703 Summary: [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug binutils/20704] New: [libopcodes][x86]

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 Bug ID: 20704 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assig

[Bug binutils/20704] [libopcodes][x86] Decodes in valid PTEST instruction as opcode with no operands.

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 nholcomb at wisc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[libopcodes][x86] |[libopcodes][x86] Decodes

[Bug binutils/20704] [libopcodes][x86] Decodes in valid PTEST instruction as opcode with no operands.

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20704 --- Comment #1 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- The following bytes produce only the opcode when decoded. The bytes themselves do not appear to be a valid instruction. Bytes: 0f 7a 20 72 Output: ptest -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug binutils/20705] New: [libopcodes][x86] VEX masking register name lacks formatting, cannot assemble

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20705 Bug ID: 20705 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] VEX masking register name lacks formatting, cannot assemble Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug binutils/20706] New: [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions using %ymm registers

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20706 Bug ID: 20706 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions using %ymm registers Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug binutils/20709] New: [libopcodes][x86]Failure to disassemble variant encoding of test instruction

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20709 Bug ID: 20709 Summary: [libopcodes][x86]Failure to disassemble variant encoding of test instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug binutils/20710] New: [libopcodes][x86] libopcodes produces "(bad)" decode for certain sal instructions

2016-10-17 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Bug ID: 20710 Summary: [libopcodes][x86] libopcodes produces "(bad)" decode for certain sal instructions Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/20703] [gas][x86] Cannot assemble certain registers for vpmuludq instruction

2016-10-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20703 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|