https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20063
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Paul.
> Would it be possible to get notified when this is going to be pushed in a
> release or anything so I can try it with couple of other crashes I have (with
> the invalid SHT_GROUP entry again)
I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20062
Steven Shi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven.shi at intel dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20047
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20047
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e2e3ca03ef70a42e34df743e9369ecb23726e921
commit e2e3ca03ef70a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20047
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
--- Comment #2 from Chua Zheng Leong ---
Hi Nick,
root@melynx-squirrel:~/binutils-gdb/gas# ./as-new --version
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.26.51.20160510
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Chua,
Ah - this assembler was compiled for a 32-bit host, yes ?
Running the same test using an assembler compiled for a 64-bit
host does not produce the error because a bignum is not produced
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a6684f0dddb292873f962dc36b20e6db00ef6b09
commit a6684f0dddb292873f962dc36b2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20060
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc*
Host|powerpc64le-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20060
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3bd43ebcb6025a8a43f119238f490e2e238697a2
commit 3bd43ebcb6025a8a43f119238f490
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20060
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ad79d09b98fcb5574b1353554018762628d2be88
commit ad79d09b98fcb55
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20060
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20022
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
>
> > Somewhere in _bfd_elf_is_start_stop?
>
> I don't think that will work. We only want to trigger if an orphan section
> i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20068
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Christophe,
> The new test fails on armeb-linux-gnueabihf:
> ./gas/testsuite/gas.sum:FAIL: PR20068 - Misaligned constant pool when running
> GAS on a 32-bit host.
Ah - forgot to allow for big endian A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 9253
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9253&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070
--- Comment #2 from Steven Shi ---
Hi H.J.
Your patch works for me. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils
19 matches
Mail list logo