https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=13b8c3356bc76abc3624ea9348cc8e834594dfe0
commit 13b8c3356bc76abc3624ea9348cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9206|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #19 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #17)
> I therefore believe that the set of fields tested in not enough to identify
> a section uniquely.
True.
> We could add address and offset which is mo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=91f8bf69a526912f86da81070407bba6a050e27f
commit 91f8bf69a526912f86da81070407bba6
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18)
> Created attachment 9221 [details]
> Proposed extra patch
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Ah - this is exactly the kind of situation that I thought might happen,
>
