https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9178|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9182
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9182&action=edit
Update readelf with Solaris specific information
Hi Guys,
This is a supplimental patch that I intend to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19939
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #3)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
>
> sorry, i thought you were saying 2.26 wasn't working. i don't think there's
> any significant differences between 2.
While not a bug report, I have been told to write this site for information and
help. Sorry if it's inappropriate.
The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-bit ARMv8 processor (WiFi, Bluetooth, C,
Python, Mathematica, FreeOffice, etc. all free
with the still US$35 board!) and I'm using the GNU assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
On 12 Apr 2016 13:55, Pervin, William wrote:
> While not a bug report, I have been told to write this site for information
> and help. Sorry if it's inappropriate.
you want binut...@sourceware.org for general discussion
https://sourceware.org/binutils/
> The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Do
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Summa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
We could of course change the default back to --disable-initfini-array for SH,
but that would just be hiding the real problem. Please verify that linking one
of the failing testcases with -Wl,--disable-initf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #6 from D337z ---
Umm...there is no ld.log file in ld. O_o
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.or
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #7 from D337z ---
Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that I had to run make check again. I'll upload a
few files for what failed. Gold failed 2 tests, so I'll upload the log files
for that as well.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #8 from D337z ---
Created attachment 9186
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9186&action=edit
ld.log file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #9 from D337z ---
Created attachment 9187
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9187&action=edit
Gold testsuite.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to D337z from comment #8)
> Created attachment 9186 [details]
> ld.log file
I think most of them are dup of PR 19774. Please try master branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
D337z changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9186|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #12 from D337z ---
gold passes all four tests, gdb now failing several tests (mostly in ada) and
doesn't create a log file that I can find. Compiling requires in-branch isl to
work as it can't locate installed versions.
If you lik
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--- Comment #13 from D337z ---
(In reply to D337z from comment #12)
> gold passes all four tests, gdb now failing several tests (mostly in ada)
> and doesn't create a log file that I can find. Compiling requires in-branch
> isl to work as it
20 matches
Mail list logo
