https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #1 from Paul Carroll ---
If it would be useful, I can attach the 10k executable that I created from
compiling my test case. I would presume the test case could be compiled for
any target with g++ 5.2.0 to demonstrate this issue.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 8827
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8827&action=edit
patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, please attach the executable. On both x86_64 and powerpc64le I didn't
have any address range info for myfunc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #4 from Paul Carroll ---
Created attachment 8828
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8828&action=edit
Executable compiled for ARM Linux with G++ 5.2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=923b198a8426f02866f33362b26ed8bbf7a5c5cd
commit 923b198a8426f02866f33362b26ed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315
--- Comment #7 from Paul Carroll ---
Thanks, Alan.
I tried the patch on several test cases and they behaved as expected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
