[Bug binutils/19020] New: objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 Bug ID: 19020 Summary: objcopy interleave feature broken Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/19005] objcopy buffer-over-read

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Stubbs --- Done: pr19020. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.g

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs --- My patch in PR19005 has a testcase for --reverse-bytes, but that test passes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #2) > My patch in PR19005 has a testcase for --reverse-bytes, but that test passes. Does your testcase for --reverse-bytes generate output? I am looking for a testcase of

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs --- It generates an output file, the same as the interleave test does: $ echo -n abcdefgh > in $ objcopy -I binary -O binary \ --pad-to=10 --gap-fill=65 \ --reverse-bytes=8 \ in

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 8644 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8644&action=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|unassigned at so

[Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults

2015-09-30 Thread theryuu at warpsharp dot info
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011 --- Comment #2 from Alex Smith --- I don't mind having a go but I'm unfamiliar with the binutils/ld source so I'll have to figure out where everything is first. On that note are you (or anyone who might be able to help) on irc? -- You are r

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cbd44e247ede49688e1e1fa42e57d390ad141967 commit cbd44e247ede49688e1e1fa42e57d390

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2015-09-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ld/19030] New: ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen

2015-09-30 Thread winter-...@bfw-online.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030 Bug ID: 19030 Summary: ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen Product: binutils Version: 2.25 URL: https://code.google.com/p/android/

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2015-09-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|amodra at gm

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2015-09-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=630993ec93fed0f2da1c4511b865cc69f5f0e835 commit 630993ec93fed0f2da1c4511b865c

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2015-09-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9865bd0da6e59c3a1c55605b5a6a9283ed4d542c commit 9865bd0da6e59c3a1c55605b5a6a9283

[Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults

2015-09-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Nick Clif

[Bug gold/19031] R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-09-30 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 --- Comment #1 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola --- Created attachment 8653 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8653&action=edit patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/19031] New: R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-09-30 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 Bug ID: 19031 Summary: R_386_PC32 does not imply a call Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold